The in vitro record is broad. Beyond the work above, Ali and colleagues
(2010) screened hydroxychavicol against 124 fungal strains and reported
minimum inhibitory concentrations of 7.81–62.5 µg/ml against dermatophytes
and 15.62–500 µg/ml against yeasts, with activity against Candida
biofilm [5]; a Malaysian group reported combination effects of
hydroxychavicol with amphotericin B against oral Candida species [6].
Human evidence is one small trial in a different setting: Sundaram and
colleagues (2021) randomised 60 periodontitis patients to a piper-extract
mouthwash or chlorhexidine after debridement and reported comparable
reduction of Porphyromonas gingivalis [7]. It is small, single-site, and
an oral rinse — not the skin and hygiene uses of the Malay record. The
laboratory case is genuinely strong for a grade C; the clinical case has
barely begun.
A second human trial has since been published in the same domain: a
randomised crossover study in sixty participants with mild gingivitis
found a betel-leaf dentifrice reduced gingival bleeding more than the
comparator over twenty days [9]. A 2021 review gathers the antimicrobial
literature — bacterial and fungal — together with a safety-profile section for the
leaf specifically [10], and Malaysian work has examined the leaf extract
in other models entirely [11].
Two small oral-care trials move the ladder to the clinical rung. They do
not touch the skin and hygiene uses the Malay record actually describes,
which is why the grade stays at C.